Notice: This website is continuously updated as new conference proceedings and journal volumes are published. Consequently, the figures presented here may differ from those reported in our publications.


A brief overview of our methodology is provided on the Methods page, along with references to publications documenting our approach and links to the code and data used in each study.


The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates.

Combining parametric and nonparametric models for off-policy evaluation

Authors: Omer Gottesman, Yao Liu, Scott Sussex, Emma Brunskill, Finale Doshi-Velez

ICML 2019 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details | Input Tokens: 16,099 Total number of tokens sent to the LLM as input for this paper's analysis. | Output Tokens: 4,527 Total number of tokens produced by the LLM (including reasoning/thinking tokens) for this paper's analysis.

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Across a variety of domains, our mixture-based approach outperforms the individual models alone as well as state-of-the-art importance sampling-based estimators. and 6. Experimental Results
Researcher Affiliation Academia Omer Gottesman 1 Yao Liu 2 Scott Sussex 1 Emma Brunskill 2 Finale Doshi-Velez 1, 1Harvard University 2Stanford University.
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1 presents the pseudo-code for our Mo E simulator.
Open Source Code No The information required to answer this question is not found in the paper. The paper does not provide any explicit statement or link for open-source code for the described methodology.
Open Datasets Yes We compare our Mo E simulator with different OPE estimators for two medical simulators: one for cancer (Ribba et al., 2012) and one for HIV (Ernst et al., 2006) patients.
Dataset Splits No The information required to answer this question is not found in the paper. The paper mentions generating '100 observed trajectories' but does not provide specific training, validation, or test dataset splits (e.g., percentages, sample counts, or explicit standard splits).
Hardware Specification No The information required to answer this question is not found in the paper. The paper does not provide specific hardware details (e.g., GPU/CPU models, memory amounts, or detailed computer specifications) used for running its experiments.
Software Dependencies No The information required to answer this question is not found in the paper. The paper mentions training a 'feed-forward neural net' but does not provide specific software dependencies or their version numbers (e.g., libraries, frameworks, or solvers).
Experiment Setup Yes The parametric model is trained as a feed-forward neural net with one layer of 64 hidden units with a tanh activation function.