Notice: This website is continuously updated as new conference proceedings and journal volumes are published. Consequently, the figures presented here may differ from those reported in our publications.


A brief overview of our methodology is provided on the Methods page, along with references to publications documenting our approach and links to the code and data used in each study.


The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates.

Consistency of the $k_n$-nearest neighbor rule under adaptive sampling

Authors: Robi Bhattacharjee, Geelon So, Sanjoy Dasgupta

NeurIPS 2025 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details | Input Tokens: 29,577 Total number of tokens sent to the LLM as input for this paper's analysis. | Output Tokens: 2,356 Total number of tokens produced by the LLM (including reasoning/thinking tokens) for this paper's analysis.

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Theoretical We study the kn-nearest neighbor learner within this setting. In the worst-case, the learner will fail because an adaptive process can generate spurious patterns out of noise. However, under the mild smoothing assumption that the process generating the instances is uniformly absolutely continuous and that choice of (kn)n is reasonable, the kn-nearest neighbor rule is online consistent.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Robi Bhattacharjee1 Sanjoy Dasgupta2 Geelon So2 1University of Tübingen and Tübingen AI Center 2Department of Computer Science and Engineering, UC San Diego
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1 The kn-nearest neighbor rule 1: for n = 1, 2, . . . do 2: Receive the instance Xn 3: Predict the majority vote label of the kn nearest neighbors X(1) n , . . . , X(kn) n , k=1 Y (k) n 1/2 4: Observe and memorize the label Yn 5: end for
Open Source Code No No experiments. (from checklist)
Open Datasets No No experiments. (from checklist)
Dataset Splits No No experiments. (from checklist)
Hardware Specification No No experiments. (from checklist)
Software Dependencies No No experiments. (from checklist)
Experiment Setup No No experiments. (from checklist)