Notice: This website is continuously updated as new conference proceedings and journal volumes are published. Consequently, the figures presented here may differ from those reported in our publications.


A brief overview of our methodology is provided on the Methods page, along with references to publications documenting our approach and links to the code and data used in each study.


The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates.

Direct Diffusion Bridge using Data Consistency for Inverse Problems

Authors: Hyungjin Chung, Jeongsol Kim, Jong Chul Ye

NeurIPS 2023 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details | Input Tokens: 17,668 Total number of tokens sent to the LLM as input for this paper's analysis. | Output Tokens: 4,242 Total number of tokens produced by the LLM (including reasoning/thinking tokens) for this paper's analysis.

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental 4 Experiments 4.1 Model, Dataset 4.2 Results
Researcher Affiliation Academia 1 Dept. of Bio and Brain Engineering 2Graduate School of AI Korea Advanced Institute of Science and Technology (KAIST) EMAIL
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1 CDDB Algorithm 2 CDDB (deep)
Open Source Code Yes Code is open-sourced at https://github.com/HJ-harry/CDDB
Open Datasets Yes All experiments are based on Image Net 256 256 [10]
Dataset Splits Yes We follow the standards of [26] and test our method on the following degradations: sr4x-{bicubic, pool}, deblur-{uniform, gauss}, and JPEG restoration with 1k validation images.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide specific hardware details such as GPU/CPU models or memory used for experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions various models and frameworks but does not specify software dependencies with version numbers (e.g., Python, PyTorch, CUDA versions).
Experiment Setup Yes For choosing the NFE and the hyper-parameters for each method, we closely abide to the original advised implementation: DDRM (20 NFE), DPS (1000 NFE), ΠGDM (100 NFE), DDNM (100 NFE), DDS (100 NFE). For I2SB along with the proposed method, we choose 100 NFE for JPEG restoration as we found it to be the most stable, and choose 1000 NFE for all other tasks.