Notice: This website is continuously updated as new conference proceedings and journal volumes are published. Consequently, the figures presented here may differ from those reported in our publications.


A brief overview of our methodology is provided on the Methods page, along with references to publications documenting our approach and links to the code and data used in each study.


The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates.

Dueling Bandits with Qualitative Feedback

Authors: Liyuan Xu, Junya Honda, Masashi Sugiyama5549-5556

AAAI 2019 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details | Input Tokens: 15,654 Total number of tokens sent to the LLM as input for this paper's analysis. | Output Tokens: 5,200 Total number of tokens produced by the LLM (including reasoning/thinking tokens) for this paper's analysis.

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental We test the empirical performance of the proposed algorithms through experiments based on both synthetic setting and real-world data.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Liyuan Xu,1,2 Junya Honda,1,2 Masashi Sugiyama1,2 1The University of Tokyo, 2RIKEN EMAIL, EMAIL, EMAIL
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1: Thompson Condorcet sampling
Open Source Code No The paper mentions '1The longer version including all appendices is available at https://arxiv.org/abs/1809.05274' which is a link to an arXiv preprint, but does not explicitly state that the source code for the described methodology is available at this link or elsewhere.
Open Datasets Yes We used two web search datasets. The first is the MSLRWEB10K dataset (Qin et al. 2010), which consists of 10,000 search queries over the documents from search results. ... The other is the MQ2008 dataset (Qin and Liu 2013)...
Dataset Splits No The paper mentions using 'MSLR-WEB10K dataset' and 'MQ2008 dataset' and that it 'repeat[s] 100 runs for each instance', but it does not provide specific details on train/validation/test splits (percentages, sample counts, or explicit references to predefined splits).
Hardware Specification No No specific hardware details (e.g., exact GPU/CPU models, processor types, memory amounts, or detailed computer specifications) used for running experiments are provided in the paper.
Software Dependencies No The paper does not provide specific ancillary software details, such as library or solver names with version numbers, needed to replicate the experiment.
Experiment Setup Yes We set t0 = 10, and the Figure 1 is the experimental result when the number of rankers is K = 5.