Notice: This website is continuously updated as new conference proceedings and journal volumes are published. Consequently, the figures presented here may differ from those reported in our publications.


A brief overview of our methodology is provided on the Methods page, along with references to publications documenting our approach and links to the code and data used in each study.


The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates.

Memory Networks

Authors: Jason Weston, Sumit Chopra, and Antoine Bordes

ICLR 2015 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details | Input Tokens: 19,163 Total number of tokens sent to the LLM as input for this paper's analysis. | Output Tokens: 5,049 Total number of tokens produced by the LLM (including reasoning/thinking tokens) for this paper's analysis.

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental 5 EXPERIMENTS We perform experiments on the QA dataset introduced in Fader et al. (2013). It consists of 14M statements, stored as (subject, relation, object) triples, which are stored as memories in the Mem NN model. ... Results are given in Table 1.
Researcher Affiliation Industry Jason Weston, Sumit Chopra & Antoine Bordes Facebook AI Research 770 Broadway New York, USA EMAIL
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1 Ot replacement to arg max when using write time features
Open Source Code No The paper does not provide an unambiguous statement about releasing its source code, nor does it include a direct link to a code repository for the described methodology.
Open Datasets Yes We perform experiments on the QA dataset introduced in Fader et al. (2013). ... training combines pseudo-labeled QA pairs... and 35M pairs of paraphrased questions from Wiki Answers
Dataset Splits No The paper mentions '7k statements and 3k questions from the simulator for training, and an identical number for testing' but does not explicitly describe a validation set or a three-way train/validation/test split for its main experiments.
Hardware Specification No The paper does not provide specific details about the hardware used to run the experiments, such as GPU models, CPU types, or memory specifications.
Software Dependencies No The paper does not specify software dependencies with version numbers (e.g., Python version, specific library versions like PyTorch or TensorFlow, or solver versions) that would be needed to replicate the experiments.
Experiment Setup Yes For Mem NNs we fixed the embedding dimension to 100, learning rate to 0.01 and margin γ to 0.1 and 10 epochs of training in all experiments.