Notice: This website is continuously updated as new conference proceedings and journal volumes are published. Consequently, the figures presented here may differ from those reported in our publications.


A brief overview of our methodology is provided on the Methods page, along with references to publications documenting our approach and links to the code and data used in each study.


The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates.

Momentum Residual Neural Networks

Authors: Michael E. Sander, Pierre Ablin, Mathieu Blondel, Gabriel Peyrรฉ

ICML 2021 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details | Input Tokens: 21,102 Total number of tokens sent to the LLM as input for this paper's analysis. | Output Tokens: 5,841 Total number of tokens produced by the LLM (including reasoning/thinking tokens) for this paper's analysis.

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental Our last contribution is the experimental validation of Momentum Res Nets on various learning tasks. We ๏ฌrst show that Momentum Res Nets separate point clouds that Res Nets fail to separate (Section 5.1). We also show on image datasets (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, Image Net) that Momentum Res Nets have similar accuracy as Res Nets, with a smaller memory cost (Section 5.2).
Researcher Affiliation Collaboration 1Ecole Normale Sup erieure, DMA, Paris, France 2CNRS, France 3Google Research, Brain team.
Pseudocode No The paper presents mathematical formulations and theoretical propositions but does not include any explicitly labeled 'Pseudocode' or 'Algorithm' blocks.
Open Source Code Yes Our code is available at https: //github.com/michaelsdr/momentumnet.
Open Datasets Yes We show on image datasets (CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, Image Net) that Momentum Res Nets have similar accuracy as Res Nets, with a smaller memory cost (Section 5.2). Krizhevsky, A., Nair, V., and Hinton, G. Cifar-10 (canadian institute for advanced research). URL http://www. cs. toronto. edu/kriz/cifar. html, 5, 2010. Deng, J., Dong, W., Socher, R., Li, L.-J., Li, K., and Fei-Fei, L. Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database. In 2009 IEEE conference on computer vision and pattern recognition, pp. 248 255. Ieee, 2009.
Dataset Splits No The paper discusses 'Test accuracy' and 'Test error' on datasets like CIFAR-10, CIFAR-100, and Image Net (e.g., in Table 2 and Figure 6), implying the use of test sets. However, it does not explicitly provide details about training, validation, or test dataset splits (e.g., percentages or counts) within the main body of the paper, nor does it specify how validation data was handled.
Hardware Specification Yes We used Pytorch and Nvidia Tesla V100 GPUs.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions using 'Pytorch' but does not specify a version number for it or any other software dependencies.
Experiment Setup Yes More details about the experimental setup are given in Appendix E.