Notice: This website is continuously updated as new conference proceedings and journal volumes are published. Consequently, the figures presented here may differ from those reported in our publications.


A brief overview of our methodology is provided on the Methods page, along with references to publications documenting our approach and links to the code and data used in each study.


The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates.

On the Implicit Bias of Linear Equivariant Steerable Networks

Authors: Ziyu Chen, Wei Zhu

NeurIPS 2023 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details | Input Tokens: 25,996 Total number of tokens sent to the LLM as input for this paper's analysis. | Output Tokens: 1,740 Total number of tokens produced by the LLM (including reasoning/thinking tokens) for this paper's analysis.

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Theoretical We study the implicit bias of gradient flow on linear equivariant steerable networks in group-invariant binary classification. Our findings reveal that the parameterized predictor converges in direction to the unique group-invariant classifier with a maximum margin defined by the input group action. Under a unitary assumption on the input representation, we establish the equivalence between steerable networks and data augmentation. Furthermore, we demonstrate the improved margin and generalization bound of steerable networks over their non-invariant counterparts.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Ziyu Chen Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst, MA 01003 EMAIL Wei Zhu Department of Mathematics and Statistics University of Massachusetts Amherst Amherst, MA 01003 EMAIL
Pseudocode No The paper describes algorithms and mathematical formulations in text and equations, but does not provide structured pseudocode or algorithm blocks.
Open Source Code No The paper does not contain any statement about making its source code available, nor does it provide links to a code repository.
Open Datasets No The paper describes theoretical analysis and does not use or reference specific public datasets for experimental training.
Dataset Splits No The paper is theoretical and does not describe experimental dataset splits for training, validation, or testing.
Hardware Specification No The paper focuses on theoretical analysis and does not mention any specific hardware used for experiments.
Software Dependencies No The paper is theoretical and does not mention any specific software dependencies or versions.
Experiment Setup No The paper is theoretical and does not describe an experimental setup with hyperparameters or system-level training settings.