Notice: This website is continuously updated as new conference proceedings and journal volumes are published. Consequently, the figures presented here may differ from those reported in our publications.


A brief overview of our methodology is provided on the Methods page, along with references to publications documenting our approach and links to the code and data used in each study.


The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates.

Partial Counterfactual Identification of Continuous Outcomes with a Curvature Sensitivity Model

Authors: Valentyn Melnychuk, Dennis Frauen, Stefan Feuerriegel

NeurIPS 2023 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details | Input Tokens: 44,837 Total number of tokens sent to the LLM as input for this paper's analysis. | Output Tokens: 5,000 Total number of tokens produced by the LLM (including reasoning/thinking tokens) for this paper's analysis.

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our Augmented Pseudo-Invertible Decoder. To the best of our knowledge, ours is the first partial identification model for Markovian structural causal models with continuous outcomes. We empirically demonstrate the effectiveness of our Augmented Pseudo-Invertible Decoder. Finally, we demonstrate its effectiveness across several numerical experiments.
Researcher Affiliation Academia Valentyn Melnychuk, Dennis Frauen & Stefan Feuerriegel LMU Munich & Munich Center for Machine Learning (MCML) Munich, Germany EMAIL
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1 Training algorithm of APID
Open Source Code Yes Code is available at https://github.com/Valentyn1997/CSM-APID.
Open Datasets Yes To show the effectiveness of our APID at partial counterfactual identification, we use two synthetic datasets. We use multi-country data from [7]. It contains weekly-averaged number of recorded COVID-19 for 20 Western countries. The data is available at https://github.com/nbanho/npi_effectiveness_first_wave/blob/master/data/data_preprocessed.csv.
Dataset Splits No The paper specifies the number of observations drawn (e.g., 'na = 1,000 observations... so that n = 2,000') and filters applied, but it does not provide explicit training, validation, and test dataset splits or a cross-validation setup.
Hardware Specification Yes Experiments were carried out on 2 GPUs (NVIDIA A100-PCIE-40GB) with Intel Xeon Silver 4316 CPUs @ 2.30GHz.
Software Dependencies No The paper mentions the use of 'Adam optimizer' and 'deep learning libraries' but does not specify version numbers for programming languages (e.g., Python) or other key software libraries (e.g., PyTorch, TensorFlow).
Experiment Setup Yes We use the Adam optimizer [71] with a learning rate η = 0.01 and a minibatch size of b = 32 to fit our APID. [...] For the residual normalizing flows, we use t = 15 residual transformations, each with ht = 5 units of the hidden layers. We set the relative and absolute tolerance of the fixed point iterations to 0.0001 and a maximal number of iterations to 200. For variational augmentations, we set the number of units in the hidden layer to hg = 5, and the variance of the augmentation to ε2 = 0.52. For the noise regularization, we chose σ2 = 0.0012.