Notice: This website is continuously updated as new conference proceedings and journal volumes are published. Consequently, the figures presented here may differ from those reported in our publications.
A brief overview of our methodology is provided on the Methods page, along with references to publications documenting our approach and links to the code and data used in each study.
The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates.
Path-Adaptive Matting for Efficient Inference Under Various Computational Cost Constraints
Authors: Qinglin Liu, Zonglin Li, Xiaoqian Lv, Xin Sun, Ru Li, Shengping Zhang
AAAI 2025 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details | Input Tokens: 15,524 Total number of tokens sent to the LLM as input for this paper's analysis. | Output Tokens: 3,498 Total number of tokens produced by the LLM (including reasoning/thinking tokens) for this paper's analysis.
| Reproducibility Variable | Result | LLM Response |
|---|---|---|
| Research Type | Experimental | Experiments on five image matting datasets demonstrate that the proposed PAM framework achieves competitive performance across a range of computational cost constraints. |
| Researcher Affiliation | Academia | 1 Harbin Institute of Technology, Weihai, China EMAIL, EMAIL, EMAIL, EMAIL, EMAIL, EMAIL |
| Pseudocode | Yes | Algorithm 1: Performance-Aware Path Learning |
| Open Source Code | No | The paper discusses implementation details using the Py Torch framework but does not explicitly state that the code is open-source or provide a link to a repository for the described methodology. |
| Open Datasets | Yes | Experiments on five image matting datasets demonstrate that the proposed PAM framework achieves competitive performance across a range of computational cost constraints, specifically Adobe Composition-1k (Xu et al. 2017), Distinctions-646 (Qiao et al. 2020), Transparent-460 (Cai et al. 2022), Semantic Image Matting (SIMD) (Sun, Tang, and Tai 2021), as well as the real-world Automatic Image Matting-500 (AIM-500) dataset (Li, Zhang, and Tao 2021). |
| Dataset Splits | No | The paper mentions using several datasets for evaluation but does not specify the training, validation, or test splits. It states, 'To avoid overfitting, we follow the data preprocessing methods of previous matting methods to process the train data (Forte and Piti e 2020).' |
| Hardware Specification | Yes | We train our PAM framework on an RTX 3090 GPU with a batch size of 4. |
| Software Dependencies | No | The proposed method is implemented using the Py Torch framework. (No specific version number provided for PyTorch or other libraries.) |
| Experiment Setup | Yes | We train our PAM framework on an RTX 3090 GPU with a batch size of 4. All network weights are initialized using the Kaiming initializer (He et al. 2015). The networks are trained using the Radam optimizer (Liu et al. 2020a) with a weight decay of 3 10 5 and betas of (0.5, 0.999). The initial learning rate is set to 3 10 4 and decays to zero using a cosine annealing scheduler in each stage. In the first stage, we train the entire PAM network for 150 epochs. In the second stage, we perform warm-up training by randomly sampling sub-networks and training them for 20 epochs. In the third stage, we train PAM with the performance-aware path learning strategy for 150 epochs. The other coefficients used in this method are configured as follows: N a = 4, λα = 1, λds = 0.05, λpt = 0.05, λ1 = 1, λcomp = 0.25, λlap = 0.5, ϵ = 10 6, N e = 4, N val = 103, N g = 10, and τ = 1. |