Notice: This website is continuously updated as new conference proceedings and journal volumes are published. Consequently, the figures presented here may differ from those reported in our publications.


A brief overview of our methodology is provided on the Methods page, along with references to publications documenting our approach and links to the code and data used in each study.


The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates.

Position: Open-Endedness is Essential for Artificial Superhuman Intelligence

Authors: Edward Hughes, Michael D Dennis, Jack Parker-Holder, Feryal Behbahani, Aditi Mavalankar, Yuge Shi, Tom Schaul, Tim Rocktäschel

ICML 2024 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details | Input Tokens: 33,608 Total number of tokens sent to the LLM as input for this paper's analysis. | Output Tokens: 4,815 Total number of tokens produced by the LLM (including reasoning/thinking tokens) for this paper's analysis.

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Theoretical In this position paper, we argue that the ingredients are now in place to achieve openendedness in AI systems with respect to a human observer.
Researcher Affiliation Industry 1Google Deep Mind, London, UK. Correspondence to: Edward Hughes <EMAIL>, Michael Dennis <EMAIL>.
Pseudocode No The paper does not contain any pseudocode or clearly labeled algorithm blocks.
Open Source Code No The paper is a position paper and does not describe a new method for which source code would be released. No statement about code availability is present.
Open Datasets No The paper is a position paper and does not conduct experiments that would involve training data. It does not provide access information for any dataset used in its own research.
Dataset Splits No The paper is a position paper and does not conduct experiments that would require specifying validation dataset splits.
Hardware Specification No The paper is a position paper and does not conduct experiments, thus no hardware specifications are mentioned.
Software Dependencies No The paper is a position paper and does not conduct experiments, thus no specific software dependencies with version numbers are mentioned.
Experiment Setup No The paper is a position paper and does not conduct experiments, thus no experimental setup details like hyperparameters or training settings are provided.