Notice: This website is continuously updated as new conference proceedings and journal volumes are published. Consequently, the figures presented here may differ from those reported in our publications.


A brief overview of our methodology is provided on the Methods page, along with references to publications documenting our approach and links to the code and data used in each study.


The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates.

Regularized Optimal Transport is Ground Cost Adversarial

Authors: François-Pierre Paty, Marco Cuturi

ICML 2020 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details | Input Tokens: 19,871 Total number of tokens sent to the LLM as input for this paper's analysis. | Output Tokens: 4,403 Total number of tokens produced by the LLM (including reasoning/thinking tokens) for this paper's analysis.

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Experimental 8. Experiments, We plot in Figure 2 the mean value of c Wε T 2(µi, νi) depending on ε, In Figure 3, we visualize the effect of the regularization ε on the ground cost cε itself, We use multidimensional scaling on the adversarial cost matrix cε (with distances between points from the same measures unchanged) to recover points in R2.
Researcher Affiliation Collaboration 1CREST / ENSAE Paris, Institut Polytechnique de Paris 2Google Brain.
Pseudocode Yes Algorithm 1 Projected (sub)Gradient Ascent for Nonnegative Adversarial Cost and Algorithm 2 Randomized (Block) Coordinate Ascent for sequential SRW
Open Source Code No No statement regarding the release of source code or a link to a code repository was found.
Open Datasets No We consider 20 measures (µi)i=1,...,10, (νj)j=1,...,10 on the red-green-blue color space identified with X = [0, 1]3. Each measure is a point cloud corresponding to the colors used in a painting, divided into two types: ten portraits by Modigliani (µi, i M) and ten by Schiele (νj, j S). (No concrete access information for these specific datasets provided).
Dataset Splits No No specific dataset split information (percentages, counts, or predefined splits) for training, validation, or testing is provided.
Hardware Specification No No specific hardware details (exact GPU/CPU models, processor types, memory amounts, or detailed computer specifications) are provided for running experiments.
Software Dependencies No No specific ancillary software details (e.g., library or solver names with version numbers) are provided.
Experiment Setup No The paper mentions 'learning rate lr' and 'MAXITER' in the algorithms, and 'projected SGD' but does not provide concrete hyperparameter values or specific training configurations (e.g., specific learning rate value, number of epochs, batch size).