Notice: This website is continuously updated as new conference proceedings and journal volumes are published. Consequently, the figures presented here may differ from those reported in our publications.


A brief overview of our methodology is provided on the Methods page, along with references to publications documenting our approach and links to the code and data used in each study.


The reproducibility variables underlying each score are classified using an automated LLM-based pipeline, validated against a manually labeled dataset. LLM-based classification introduces uncertainty and potential bias; scores should be interpreted as estimates.

The Complexity of Finding Stationary Points with Stochastic Gradient Descent

Authors: Yoel Drori, Ohad Shamir

ICML 2020 | Venue PDF | LLM Run Details | Input Tokens: 17,546 Total number of tokens sent to the LLM as input for this paper's analysis. | Output Tokens: 4,636 Total number of tokens produced by the LLM (including reasoning/thinking tokens) for this paper's analysis.

Reproducibility Variable Result LLM Response
Research Type Theoretical We study the iteration complexity of stochastic gradient descent (SGD) for minimizing the gradient norm of smooth, possibly nonconvex functions. We provide several results, implying that the classical O(ϵ 4) upper bound (for making the average gradient norm less than ϵ) cannot be improved upon, unless a combination of additional assumptions is made. Notably, this holds even if we limit ourselves to convex quadratic functions. We also show that for nonconvex functions, the feasibility of minimizing gradients with SGD is surprisingly sensitive to the choice of optimality criteria.
Researcher Affiliation Collaboration 1Google Research 2Weizmann Institute of Science.
Pseudocode No The paper describes the SGD algorithm in textual form (e.g., 'xt+1 = xt ηt ( f(xt) + ξt)'), but does not include a formally structured pseudocode block or algorithm box.
Open Source Code No The paper does not contain any statement about releasing source code for the described theoretical work, nor does it provide any links to a code repository.
Open Datasets No This is a theoretical paper and does not describe experiments involving datasets or training procedures.
Dataset Splits No This is a theoretical paper and does not involve dataset splits (training, validation, test) for empirical evaluation.
Hardware Specification No This is a theoretical paper and does not describe experiments that would require hardware specifications.
Software Dependencies No This is a theoretical paper focused on mathematical analysis, and therefore does not list software dependencies or version numbers.
Experiment Setup No This is a theoretical paper and does not describe an experimental setup, hyperparameters, or training configurations.